www.quake.ie  

discord - the Ireland Gaming Club  
IEGC - www.irelandgamingclub.com  
Ireland Gaming Club - facebook  

Quake Live Server - quake.hagfish.ing  


search  
 quake.ie | anonymous | login | register

quake.ie columns shanaigans
 12/03/2001   shanaigans476 views | 3 replies 
Havok
Neil Morgan


I am ur father

posts : 81


quite alot going on at the moment.

my clan acid are getting back into the swing of things, after both the savage cup and wireplay leauge starting in the same week.

savage was abit of a porky, overlord could'nd play due to colege. our pings wern't great in comparison to the other clans , i had bullshit pl on eircom.

after getting hammered by unr in the first (no comment) game we procceded to rape dn in the 2nd.

we should have won the remaining 2 games, sxr we're good alight, had good tactics, but with our players on on twise that of theirs what chance did we have?

it was still a close game we would have 0wned on even ping. then came al, same story esp with airk effictivly hpb on 150+ ping. even worse was they fact they were total shit, no teamplay, we were robed of the win imo.



our wireplay game vs virtual suicude had to be reshedualed, due to their savage games being on @ the same time. first game was on dm7tmp.
we ended up playing on their server,
yet again, with cablers on 100 packets ect when ever u went near them ur lagometer went bonkers.
we only lost by 20 frags, which was'nd bad esp considering gerry got dissed in the middle and we breifly played 3 v 4.

they were a good team to be fair to them, they held ra / mh very well, it would have been closer on even ping tho.

during the first game we'd asked them to play on our server for the 2nd.
quite suprisingly they agreed, credit where credit's due to them, they where under no obligation to do so, cheers vs



so for the 2nd game (cpm4) we all hoped on vishnu, lovley 50 - 70 pings for us (well me anyways) they had the same. for some reason gerry was on horrible 100+ ping. which was really strange cos we where both in the same isp (indigo) i he only lives like 5 mins from my gaff.

anyways, we took ra right from the start. with some good teamplay and good coaching from airk we managed to hold it and build up a lead for the first half of the game.
after 10 mins vs went on a big push to retake ra, and for a while they did.

the remaing game was constant scraps to ratake control of red armour.
in the end us coming out on top.



the savage cup is all over for most clans, really looking forward to the rest of the wp leauge, and the bw leauge starting up soon...


 
 

14/03/2001#1
Illkillya
James Galvin


Entering a world of pain
clan : fish heads

posts : 892
site administrator
ive donated to quake.ie!


FH had the same problem - we were up agaisnt an ICQ using clan whom we raped on cpm4 (which is not dependent on ping). But our isdn pings of 120 in fights could not compete with their cable 30 pings on dm7, and we lost. dm7 should only be played when both sides have fairly equal ping. it was stupid for Savage to use dm7 as the map for all games
 
 

18/03/2001#2
Sky
Rick Walker




posts : 90


"Yet again, with cablers on 100 packets ect when ever u went near them ur lagometer went bonkers."

If this is Wireplay DML, the rules say maxpackets should be capped at 80. If they were using 100, then they shouldn't have been.
n1 on cpm4 tho lads - beating a cable team on that map takes some doing imo.
 
 
you must be logged in to post replies.
click here to login.
click here to become a member.
click here to search.